An inceldom enabler is a person who either knowingly or unknowingly promotes the phenomenon of inceldom. Although nihilistic hedonism is listed as a separate and distinct archetype within this article, the reason it is tagged in brackets in the article title is because this trait in one way or another pervades among all other archetypes as well.
- Some nefarious figures perceive that they may gain social status through the act of mystifying the notion of sex. Acts associated with sexuality were historically regarded as one of the Maslow needs which were primary practical, and with minimal mysticism associated with it. However, once erotic conglomerates began to see just how profitable it would be to commodify the act of sex, by necessity, the act became increasingly mystified. These conglomerates do this by the societal promotion of mixoscopia, also known as pictophilia, scoptolagnia or scopophilia (arousal from viewing sex) rather than copulation (actual sex).
- Another purveyor of inceldom, or an inceldom enabler, is the sex-negative feminist. Although when pressed, she insists she seeks to promote a healthy form of sexuality, in reality she's a participant in the ideological sex war called "Maslowism vs Fapathy". The fact that the sex-negative feminist rejects Maslowism is an indictment on her claim that she promotes healthiness, since rejecting a fundamental aspect of human development and nature (i.e. Maslowism) is obviously unhealthy.
- Another constituent of the inceldom-enabler is the one who seeks to benefit from the existence of social stratification wherein able-bodied people are considered more valuable due to being more competent. In the more extreme stance, this would take the form of societal acceptance of ableism, i.e. discrimination against handicapped people. In the more subtle or subdued stance, this takes the form of societal promotion and normalization of demisexuality (emotional attachments) even for people who are alexithymic, asocial, very introverted, have emotional detachent etc. as opposed to acceptance of those who are purely allosexual or are aromantic allosexuals. Since aromantic allosexuality is predominantly a male trait, by extension, this form of inceldom-enabling would also constitute a form of androphobia.
- There is also the inceldom-enabler who is the nihilistic hedonist. Due to the foundational basis of capitalism not only as an economic basis of society, but also almost as a cultural basis, it is easier and easier to drift into this nihilistic hedonism mind-set in the west. Nihilistic hedonism with relation to inceldom can take on two forms; (a) the proactive one whereby human males are effectively treated in a manner similar to how male farm animals are treated. This is done for maintaining oversight of the genetics and (for example) positively influence traits in the calves. You can see this throughout history pertaining to treatment of guest workers on visas whose renewal terms are indefinite. In contrast to the proactive inceldom-enabler who is a nihilistic hedonist, there is also a non-proactive version, i.e. the passive nihilistic hedonist. The passive nihilistic hedonist inceldom-enabler sees all the aforementioned things and is apathetic towards it or even verbally dismisses it as a concern.
- Another inceldom-enabler has an archetype that's analogous to a politician whose a practical cockblocker, whereby peacocking means are boosted for one gender but not the other. This archetype doesn't directly enable inceldom overtly, but rather does so covertly and indirectly by targeting venues that usually serve as a path for romantic or sexual encounters to occur. Men are usually required to take initiative with regards to courtship. Therefore, such cockblocking politicians are not only doing doing men a disfavor, but women too when one gender is given priority with regards to means being provided for peacocking, such as housing, employment opportunities, and cliche phrases such as "women should be independent from men".
- Another inceldom enabler is the proponent of getting carried away with regards to gender norms; one such example is gender empowerment. Gender empowerment, in the western world, usually has a feminine/feminist slant. The most stable and natural regiment through which gender relations should be established is one which is egalitarian and/or follows a principle that most religions and certainly all major world religions adhere to, that of the golden rule: treat others as one would like unto themselves, and the silver rule: don't treat others as would be objectionable to oneself. When these principles are abandoned, you inevitably get androcentrism and gynocentrism. In the dating scene, instincts in tune with our primitive selves such as sexual darwinism become amplified. Another manner through which getting carried away vis-a-vis gender norms occurs is by the one who pushes the notion that men should be exuberant.